Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy ›› 2023, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 321-332.doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230041
• Review Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Osama Mahmoud, BSa, Ajay Makkena, BSa, Corinne E. Wessner, MS, MBA, RDMSb, Ji-Bin Liu, MDb, John R. Eisenbrey, PhDb, Andrej Lyshchik, MD, PhDb,*(
)
Received:2023-06-21
Revised:2023-07-21
Accepted:2023-08-20
Online:2023-12-30
Published:2023-10-23
Contact:
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 7th Floor Main Building, 132 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. e-mail: Osama Mahmoud, BS, Ajay Makkena, BS, Corinne E. Wessner, MS, MBA, RDMS, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, John R. Eisenbrey, PhD, Andrej Lyshchik, MD, PhD. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS: A Pictorial Review. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(4): 321-332.
Figure 1
(A) Sagittal image of a hepatic segment 8 isoechoic solid observation measuring 28 mm; (B) At 22 seconds, the lesion demonstrates peripheral globular enhancement during the arterial phase; (C and D) At 1 minute and 5 minutes post injection show no washout with continued peripheral globular enhancement."
Figure 2
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 3 hyperechoic solid observation measuring 27 mm; (B) This image is at 25 seconds, demonstrating peripheral globular enhancement during the arterial phase with areas of non-enhancement; (C and D) Images obtained at 1- and 4-minutes post-injection showing iso-enhancement with no washout."
Figure 3
(A) Sagittal image of a hepatic segment 6 solid isoechoic observation measuring 37 mm; (B) This image is at 23 seconds, demonstrating global iso-enhancement during arterial phase; (C and D) Images obtained at 2- and 6-minutes post-injection show an iso-enhanced observation with no washout."
Figure 4
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 5 hyperechoic solid observation measuring 20 mm; (B) This image is at 17 seconds, demonstrating global iso-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C-E) Images obtained at 1-, 3-, and 5-minutes post-injection show iso-enhancement with no washout."
Figure 5
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 8 solid hyperechoic observation measuring 11 mm; (B) This image is taken at 19 seconds, demonstrating global hypo-enhancement during arterial phase; (C and D) Images obtained at 4- and 6-minutes post-injection show no washout."
Figure 6
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 4 hypoechoic solid observation measuring 14 mm; (B) Image at 17 seconds, demonstrating global iso-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C and D) Images at 2- and 4-minutes post-injection show iso-enhancement with no washout."
Figure 7
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 6 solid hyperechoic observation measuring 19 mm; (B) At 22 seconds the lesion demonstrates global hyper-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C and D) Images obtained at 1- and 4-minutes post-injection show an iso-enhanced observation with no washout."
Figure 8
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 6 with mixed echogenicity solid observation measuring 18 mm; (B) At 12 seconds the lesion demonstrates global hyper-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C-E) Images obtained at 1-, 2-, and 5-minutes post-injection show iso-enhancement with no washout."
Figure 9
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 2 solid isoechoic with circumscribed margins measuring 33 mm; (B) At 8 seconds the lesion demonstrates global hyper-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C and D) Images obtained at 4- and 7-minutes post-injection show mild weak washout."
Figure 12
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 8 infiltrative hypoechoic solid observation measuring 17 mm; (B) This image is at 12 seconds, demonstrating global hyper-enhancement during the arterial phase; (C-E) Images obtained at 2-, 3-, and 5-minutes post-injection, demonstrating mild washout."
Figure 14
(A) Sagittal and transverse images of a hepatic segment 8 mixed echogenicity solid observation measuring 32 mm; (B) This image is at 25 seconds. The image demonstrates global hyper-enhancement during arterial phase; (C) This image is at 50 seconds post-injection, showing marked washout; (D and E) Images obtained at 1- and 2-minutes post-injection continuously demonstrating marked washout."
| [1] |
Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, Lesi O, Cabasag CJ, Vignat J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol 2022; 77:1598-1606.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021 pmid: 36208844 |
| [2] |
Ding J, Long L, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhou H, Zhou Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: Comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:847-854.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07159-z |
| [3] |
Tan Z, Teoh WC, Wong KM, Wansaicheong GK, Sandrasegaran K. Analysis of comparative performance of CEUS and CECT/MR LI-RADS classification: Can CEUS dichotomize LI-RADS indeterminate lesions on CT or MRI? Clin Imaging 2020; 62:63-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.002 |
| [4] |
Golabi P, Fazel S, Otgonsuren M, Sayiner M, Locklear CT, Younossi ZM. Mortality assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to underlying disease and treatment modalities. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e5904.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005904 |
| [5] | Tunissiolli NM, Castanhole-Nunes MMU, Biselli-Chicote PM, Pavarino EC, da Silva RF, da Silva RC, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive review of biomarkers, clinical aspects, and therapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:863-872. |
| [6] | American College of Radiology. LI-RADS® CEUS v2017 | American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/LI-RADS/CEUS-LI-RADS-2017-Core.pdf |
| [7] |
Wilson SR, Lyshchik A, Piscaglia F, Cosgrove D, Jang HJ, Sirlin C, et al. CEUS LI-RADS: algorithm, implementation, and key differences from CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:127-142.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1250-0 pmid: 28819825 |
| [8] |
Eisenbrey JR, Gabriel H, Savsani E, Lyshchik A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in HCC diagnosis and assessment of tumor response to locoregional therapies. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3579-3595.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03059-y pmid: 33825927 |
| [9] | Morgan TA, Maturen KE, Dahiya N, Sun MRM, Kamaya A. US LI-RADS: Ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for screening and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:41-55. |
| [10] |
Chen LD, Ruan SM, Lin Y, Liang JY, Shen SL, Hu HT, et al. Comparison between M-score and LR-M in the reporting system of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:4249-4257.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5927-8 pmid: 30569182 |
| [11] | Li CQ, Huang H, Ruan SM, Hu HT, Xian MF, Xie XY, et al. An assessment of liver lesions using a combination of CEUS LI-RADS and AFP. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1311-1320. |
| [12] | Zheng W, Li Q, Zou XB, Wang JW, Han F, Li F, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS version 2017: Application on 2020 liver nodules in patients with hepatitis B infection. Radiology 2020; 294:299-307. |
| [13] |
Lyshchik A, Kono Y, Dietrich CF, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Piscaglia F, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:861-879.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1392-0 pmid: 29151131 |
| [14] |
Hu YX, Shen JX, Han J, Mao SY, Mao RS, Li Q, et al. Diagnosis of non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancies in patients with risks for hepatocellular carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS. Front Oncol 2021; 11:641195.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641195 |
| [15] |
Liu W, Qin J, Guo R, Xie S, Jiang H, Wang X, et al. Accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS. Acta Radiol 2018; 59:140-146.
doi: 10.1177/0284185117716700 pmid: 28648125 |
| [16] |
Terzi E, Iavarone M, Pompili M, Veronese L, Cabibbo G, Fraquelli M, et al. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter retrospective study of 1,006 nodules. J Hepatol 2018; 68:485-492.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.007 |
| [17] |
Bartolotta TV, Terranova MC, Gagliardo C, Taibbi A. CEUS LI-RADS: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:9.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0819-2 |
| [18] |
Kim DH, Choi SH, Park SH, Kim KW, Byun JH, Kim SY, et al. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor-in-vein category: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:2497-2506.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07282-x |
| [19] |
Nguyen SA, Merrill CD, Burrowes DP, Medellin GA, Wilson SR. Hepatocellular carcinoma in evolution: Correlation with CEUS LI-RADS. Radiographics 2022; 42:1028-1042.
doi: 10.1148/rg.210149 |
| [20] |
Li W, Li L, Zhuang BW, Ruan SM, Hu HT, Huang Y, et al. Inter-reader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS among radiologists with different levels of experience. European Radiology 2021; 31:6758-6767.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07777-1 pmid: 33675388 |
| [21] | Sugimoto K, Kakegawa T, Takahashi H, Tomita Y, Abe M, Yoshimasu Y, et al. Usefulness of modified CEUS LI-RADS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using Sonazoid. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:828. |
| [22] |
Schellhaas B, Hammon M, Strobel D, Pfeifer L, Kielisch C, Goertz RS, et al. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:4254-4264.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5379-1 pmid: 29675659 |
| [23] | Quaia E. State of the art: LI-RADS for contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 2019;293. |
| [24] | World Health Organization. Number of new cases and deaths from liver cancer is predicted to rise by more than 55% by 2040. https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/number-of-new-cases-and-deaths-from-liver-cancer-predicted-to-rise-by-more-than-55-by-2040/ |
| [1] | Liu Taixia, Wang Hanxiang, Wang Dan, Zhang Yuke, Guo Yunyun, Liu Shuo, Zhang Minfeng, Nie Hongming, Shen Rui. The Role of Sonazoid-contrast-enhanced Ultrasound In Precision Diagnosis and Guidance for Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Literature Review [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2026, 10(1): 20-28. |
| [2] | Guan Xin, Hu Xinyuan, Han Hong, Zhang Dezhi, Xu Huixiong. The Evolving Application of Ultrasound in the Precision Management of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(4): 375-387. |
| [3] | Yu Xiao jie, Song Zheng lai, Chang Xue yong, Yu Jie, Liang Ping. Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Liver Nodules: A Comprehensive Review of B-Mode and Contrast-enhanced Applications [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(4): 326-346. |
| [4] | Zhong Xian, Xie Xiaoyan. Multimodal Ultrasound Radiomics in Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Directions [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(4): 388-408. |
| [5] | Xu Junmei, Tahmasebi Aylin, Mohammed Amr, Pour Bahareh Kian, Liu Ji-Bin, Eisenbrey John R.. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS for Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment in Liver Tumor: A Pictorial Review Based on LR-TR v2024 [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(4): 357-374. |
| [6] | Liu Xinyu, Yuan Yinuo, Meng Yao, Zhang Wenjing, Xu Huimin, Zhang Jinrui, Liu Cun. Glomus Tumor of the Female Vulva: A Case Report and Review [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(2): 219-223. |
| [7] | Wang Yixuan, Jin Lin, Chen Jianxiong, Yang Huixian, Shen Cuiqin, Xu Wenzhe, Shen Yuzhou, Huang Jun, Sun Liwan, Du Lianfang, Wang Bei, Li Fan, Li Zhaojun. Is the Adventitial Vasa Vasorum in Vulnerable Carotid Plaques Increased or Decreased? [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(1): 56-64. |
| [8] | Yue Tian, MB, Yanan Zhao, MD, Yiran Huang, MB. The Diagnostic Value of Real-time Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Hepatic Hemangioma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2024, 8(3): 124-129. |
| [9] | Priscilla Machado, MD, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, Flemming Forsberg, PhD. Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Using Contrast Lymphosonography: A Systematic Review [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 1-7. |
| [10] | Ping Wang, MM, Yuqun Luo, MM, Yunkai Li, MM, Wensheng Yue, MD, Duo Huang, MD, Xuemei Lin, MM, Shaoli Xie, MM, Bin Xiong, MM. A Misdiagnosed Cervical Vagal Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of Its Imaging Features and Differential Diagnosis [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2023, 7(1): 53-56. |
| [11] | Felipe Velasquez-Botero, MD, Ananya Balasubramanya, Ying Tang, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, John R. Eisenbrey, PhD. Renal Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound: Clinical Applications and Emerging Research [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(4): 129-146. |
| [12] | Yanling Chen, MM, Hantao Wang, MM, Hong Han, PhD, Yi Dong, PhD, Wen-ping Wang, MD. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound of Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver in Adult: Two Cases Report and Literature Review [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(4): 204-209. |
| [13] | Huolin Ye, MD, Qiannan Huang, MD, Qingjing Zeng, MD, Xuqi He, MD, Erjiao Xu, MD, Yinglin Long, MD, Kai Li, MD, Rongqin Zheng, MD. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Active Needle Tract Bleeding during Thermal Ablation of Liver Cancer [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(3): 104-111. |
| [14] | Brenda E. Tester, BS, MS, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, John R. Eisenbrey, PhD, George Koenig, MD. Emerging Applications of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Trauma [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(2): 39-47. |
| [15] | Xuehong Diao, MD, Lin Chen, MD, Bo Yu, MS, Jiamei Jin, MS, Jia Zhan, MD, Yue Chen, BS. Follicular Thyroid Neoplasmon Conventional and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound [J]. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2022, 6(2): 48-57. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Share: WeChat
Copyright ©2018 Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
|
Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy (AUDT) a>
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a>.
