Current Status and Prospects of Simulation-based Medical Education in Ultrasound

doi:10.26599/AUDT.2026.260044

Abstract

Abstract:

Simulation-based ultrasound education (SBUE) is an important component of ultrasound education and prepares learners before they begin clinical practice. It has gradually evolved from single-skill training centered on phantoms and task trainers into an educational system that emphasizes clinical contexts, continuous assessment, and the development of clinical competence. This review summarizes the developmental history, major modalities, educational implementation and evaluation, current limitations, and future directions of SBUE. Major SBUE modalities include physical models, virtual simulation, standardized patients (SPs), scenario-based simulation, and telesimulation. Courses should be designed around clinical tasks, competency objectives, and available resources, with staged feedback and continuous assessment to improve performance on specific tasks over both the short and long term. Evidence that these gains translate into clinical performance and patient outcomes remains limited. Future studies should focus on developing a competency-based system with refined tiered frameworks and longitudinal assessment pathways, as well as exploring applications of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies in ultrasound simulation education.

Key words: Simulation-based medical education; Simulation-based ultrasound education; Ultrasound education; Clinical competence; Competency assessment

Lu Weidan, Zhao Ruina, Liu Jibin, Zhang Bo. Current Status and Prospects of Simulation-based Medical Education in Ultrasound. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2026, 10(4): 394-402.

/ Recommend

Figures/Tables 5

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

References 69

[1]	Wan YL, Weimer J, Leung KY, Jenssen C, Möller K, Nourkami-Tutdibi N, et al. Ultrasound education for medical students: principles, training approaches, and current controversies. Adv Med Educ Pract 2026; 17: 602944
[2]	Martin R, Lau HA, Morrison R, Bhargava P, Deiling K. The rising tide of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in medical education: an essential skillset for undergraduate and graduate medical education. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2023; 52: 482-484. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.06.003
[3]	Johri AM, Durbin J, Newbigging J, Tanzola R, Chow R, De S, et al. Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound: state-of-the-art in medical school education. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018; 31: 749-760. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.014
[4]	Urbina J, Monks SM, Crawford SB. Simulation in ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology: a literature review. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 15: 359-364. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1816
[5]	Nitsche JF, Brost BC. Obstetric ultrasound simulation. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37: 199-204. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.012
[6]	McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? a meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011; 86: 706-711. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
[7]	Huang GS, Sheehan FH, Gill EA. Transesophageal echocardiography simulation: A review of current technology. Echocardiography 2022; 39: 89-100. doi: 10.1111/echo.15281
[8]	Borggaard PG, Kildegaard C, Laursen CB, Bhatnagar R, Volpicelli G, Pietersen PI. Progress in lung ultrasound education: an updated systematic review. Ultrasound J 2026; 18: 18361. doi: 10.5826/tuj.2026.18361
[9]	Lefebvre I, Dion PM, Boet S, Ramlogan R, Said H, Devine C, et al. Effectiveness of extended reality in simulation-based ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia training: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 2026; 73: 704-713. doi: 10.1007/s12630-026-03159-7
[10]	Bradley P. The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Med Educ 2006; 40: 254-262. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x
[11]	Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 Suppl 1 i2-i10.
[12]	Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003; 78: 783-788. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006
[13]	Buck GH. Development of simulators in medical education. Gesnerus 1991; 48: 7-28. doi: 10.1163/22977953-04801002
[14]	Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27: 10-28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924
[15]	Sidhu HS, Olubaniyi BO, Bhatnagar G, Shuen V, Dubbins P. Role of simulation-based education in ultrasound practice training. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 785-791. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.785
[16]	Lucius C, Nielsen MB, Blaivas M, Burmester E, Westerway SC, Chu CY, et al. The use of simulation in medical ultrasound: Current perspectives on applications and practical implementation (WFUMB state-of-the-art paper). Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 311-318. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000022
[17]	Harvey JA, Moran RE, Hamer MM, DeAngelis GA, Omary RA. Evaluation of a turkey-breast phantom for teaching freehand, US-guided core-needle breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 565-569. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(97)80206-1
[18]	Knudson MM, Sisley AC. Training residents using simulation technology: experience with ultrasound for trauma. J Trauma 2000; 48: 659-665. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00013
[19]	Terkamp C, Kirchner G, Wedemeyer J, Dettmer A, Kielstein J, Reindell H, et al. Simulation of abdomen sonography. evaluation of a new ultrasound simulator. Ultraschall Med 2003; 24: 239-244.
[20]	Maul H, Scharf A, Baier P, Wüstemann M, Günter HH, Gebauer G, et al. Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 581-585. doi: 10.1002/uog.1119
[21]	Heer IM, Middendorf K, Müller-Egloff S, Dugas M, Strauss A. Ultrasound training: the virtual patient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 440-444. doi: 10.1002/uog.1715
[22]	Girzadas DV Jr, Antonis MS, Zerth H, Lambert M, Clay L, Bose S, et al. Hybrid simulation combining a high fidelity scenario with a pelvic ultrasound task trainer enhances the training and evaluation of endovaginal ultrasound skills. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16: 429-435. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00399.x
[23]	Stather DR, MacEachern P, Rimmer K, Hergott CA, Tremblay A. Validation of an endobronchial ultrasound simulator: differentiating operator skill level. Respiration 2011; 81: 325-332. doi: 10.1159/000323520
[24]	Armstrong SA, Jafary R, Forsythe JS, Gregory SD. Tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound-guided needle intervention phantoms: a comprehensive review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2023; 49: 18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.07.016
[25]	Abraham SV, Melit RJ, Krishnan SV, George T, Kunhahamed MO, Kassyap CK, et al. Indigenously developed ultrasound phantom model versus a commercially available training model: randomized double-blinded study to assess its utility to teach ultrasound guided vascular access in a controlled setting. J Med Ultrasound 2022; 30: 11-19. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_48_21
[26]	Gargiulo M, Di-Rocco C, Doche J, Boyer L, Soussan J, Frandon J, et al. Low-cost homemade agar-based phantoms for ultrasound-guided procedure training: a randomized educational trial. Eur J Radiol 2026; 202: 112934. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112934
[27]	Zhang Z, Liu L, Sun D, Zhang D, Kong F, Wu Y, et al. Application of the virtual reality in the teaching of ultrasonography. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Ther 2023; 7: 193-196. doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230026
[28]	McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Acad Med 2011; 86: e8-e9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308d37
[29]	Bloch A, von Arx R, Etter R, Berger D, Kaiser H, Lenz A, et al. Impact of simulator-based training in focused transesophageal echocardiography: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2017; 125: 1140-1148. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002351
[30]	Pezel T, Dreyfus J, Mouhat B, Thébaut C, Audureau E, Bernard A, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based training on transesophageal echocardiography learning: the SIMULATOR randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8: 248-256. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5016
[31]	Jujo S, Nakahira A, Kataoka Y, Banno M, Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography simulator training: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Simul Healthc 2021; 16: 341-352. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000537
[32]	Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul (Lond) 2017; 2: 10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4
[33]	Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Edelbring S, Corral J, Hege I. Virtual Patients—What are we talking about? a framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ 2015; 15: 11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3
[34]	Brown WJ, Tortorella RAW. Hybrid medical simulation—a systematic literature review. Smart Learn Environ 2020; 7: 16. doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00127-6
[35]	Xu Z, Lian H, Ren X. Education and training models for point-of-care ultrasound in perioperative medicine: a narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2026; 13: 1873520. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1873520
[36]	Chen TY, Wang YC, Lien WC. Enhancing resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography training by integrating clinical scenarios. Resusc Plus 2025; 21: 100861. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100861
[37]	Fried A, Hathaway JA, Strout T, Mackenzie DC, Croft PE, Wilson CN, et al. Simulation-based resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography training for emergency medicine residents. J Emerg Med 2025; 72: 89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.006
[38]	Danta M, Nguyen-Phuoc AY, Gupta S, Sakhpara A, Kurbedin J, Khordipour E, et al. Simulation-based training changes attitudes of emergency physicians toward transesophageal echocardiography. West J Emerg Med 2025; 26: 465-468.
[39]	Ma J, Jia X, Li G, Guo D, Xi X, Zhou T, et al. Development of 5G-based remote ultrasound education: current status and future trends. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Ther 2023; 7: 197-203. doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230022
[40]	Burckett-St Laurent D, Cunningham MS, Abbas S, Chan VW, Okrainec A, Niazi AU. Teaching ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia remotely: a feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 995-1002. doi: 10.1111/aas.12695
[41]	Shen P, An Y, Hao C, Lyu J, Zhao H. Effectiveness and feasibility of 5G-based remote interactive ultrasound training in critical care. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 514. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05485-0
[42]	Grafton-Clarke C, Uraiby H, Gordon M, Clarke N, Rees E, Park S, et al. Pivot to online learning for adapting or continuing workplace-based clinical learning in medical education following the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME systematic review (BEME Guide No.70). Med Teach 2022; 44: 227-243. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992372
[43]	Ferreira JMG, Generoso JR Jr, Marra AR, Deliberato RO, Dewan M, Loeb D, et al. Effectiveness of low-cost, technology-enhanced simulation training for healthcare training in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic literature review. J Gen Intern Med 2025; 40: 4040-4050. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09794-y
[44]	Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013; 35: e867-e898. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
[45]	Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ 2012; 46: 636-647. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04243.x
[46]	Jensen JK, Dyre L, Jørgensen ME, Andreasen LA, Tolsgaard MG. Simulation-based point-of-care ultrasound training: a matter of competency rather than volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2018; 62: 811-819. doi: 10.1111/aas.13083
[47]	Smith S, Lobo V, Anderson KL, Gisondi MA, Sebok-Syer SS, Duanmu Y. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based mastery learning to teach the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma. AEM Educ Train 2021; 5: e10606. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10606
[48]	Mackay FD, Zhou F, Lewis D, Fraser J, Atkinson PR. Can you teach yourself point-of-care ultrasound to a level of clinical competency? evaluation of a self-directed simulation-based training program. Cureus 2018; 10: e3320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3320
[49]	Wang LW, Liu CH, Li WY, Chiang WC, Chiu YL, Ma MH, et al. Is ultrasound training sustainable? a systematic review of competency retention in healthcare trainees. Med Educ 2025; 59: 1290-1305. doi: 10.1111/medu.15751
[50]	Jensen JK, Dyre L, Jørgensen ME, Andreasen LA, Tolsgaard MG. Collecting validity evidence for simulation-based assessment of point-of-care ultrasound skills. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36: 2475-2483. doi: 10.1002/jum.14292
[51]	Teslak KE, Post JH, Tolsgaard MG, Rasmussen S, Purup MM, Friis ML. Simulation-based assessment of upper abdominal ultrasound skills. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 15. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-05018-1
[52]	Risgaard AL, Andersen IB, Friis ML, Tolsgaard MG, Danstrup CS. Validating the virtual: a deep dive into ultrasound simulator metrics in otorhinolaryngology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281: 1905-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08421-y
[53]	Pietersen PI, Konge L, Graumann O, Nielsen BU, Laursen CB. Developing and gathering validity evidence for a simulation-based test of competencies in lung ultrasound. Respiration 2019; 97: 329-336. doi: 10.1159/000493758
[54]	Nielsen MS, Clausen JH, Hoffmann-Petersen J, Konge L, Nielsen AB. Can virtual-reality simulation ensure transthoracic echocardiography skills before trainees examine patients?. Int J Med Educ 2022; 13: 267-273.
[55]	Zhao Y, Zhou P, Zhu W, Xiao J, Liu W, Luo Y, et al. Validity evidence for simulator-based obstetric ultrasound competency assessment tool: a multi-center study. Ultraschall Med 2024; 45: 168-175. doi: 10.1055/a-2122-6746
[56]	Tolsgaard MG, Todsen T, Sørensen JL, Ringsted C, Lorentzen T, Ottesen B, et al. International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One 2013; 8: e57687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057687
[57]	Wang Y, Gao L, Jiang Y, Pan H, Zhao J, Zhou X, et al. Image features-based learning effectively improves inter-observer agreement for beginners in evaluating thyroid nodule with ultrasound. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Ther 2019; 3: 1-5.
[58]	Taksøe-Vester C, Dyre L, Schroll J, Tabor A, Tolsgaard M. Simulation-based ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultraschall Med 2021; 42: e42-e54. doi: 10.1055/a-1300-1680
[59]	Takeda K, Kasai H, Tajima H, Hayama N, Saito M, Kawame C, et al. Effectiveness of lung ultrasound training utilizing a high-fidelity simulator. ATS Sch 2024; 5: 133-141. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0084OC
[60]	Lazarow F, Deal AK, Shaves SC, Knapp B, Byars D, Goodmurphy CW, et al. Evaluation of a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum and ocular phantom in residency training. J Ultrasound 2022; 25: 259-263. doi: 10.1007/s40477-021-00578-8
[61]	Koratala A, Paudel HR, Regner KR. Nephrologist-led simulation-based focused cardiac ultrasound workshop for medical students: insights and implications. Am J Med Open 2023; 10: 100051. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100051
[62]	Kahr Rasmussen N, Andersen TT, Carlsen J, Østergaard ML, Konge L, Albrecht-Beste E, et al. Simulation-based training of ultrasound-guided procedures in radiology – a systematic review. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40: 584-602.
[63]	Pendleton A, Bellomo TR, Lella SK, Jogerst K, Stefanescu A, Drachman D, et al. Development and videographic evaluation of a vascular access simulation-based curriculum for surgical and medical trainees. Ann Surg Open 2024; 5: e464
[64]	Neubauer R, Bauer CJ, Dietrich CF, Strizek B, Schäfer VS, Recker F. Evidence-based ultrasound education? A systematic literature review of undergraduate ultrasound training studies. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a22750702. doi: 10.1055/a-2275-0702
[65]	Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306: 978-988.
[66]	Wang S, Liu JB, Zhu Z, Eisenbrey JR. Artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging: current research and applications. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Ther 2019; 3: 53-61. doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2019.190811
[67]	Daum N, Blaivas M, Goudie A, Hoffmann B, Jenssen C, Neubauer R, et al. Student ultrasound education, current view and controversies: role of artificial intelligence, virtual reality and telemedicine. Ultrasound J 2024; 16: 44. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00382-5
[68]	Havins B, Nguyen M, Becker R, Lee C, Magadi S, Choi H. Point of care ultrasound training in military medical student curriculum. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Ther 2023; 7: 401-404. doi: 10.37015/AUDT.2023.230003
[69]	Mitchell AA, Ivimey-Cook ER. Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1149048. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1149048