From Non-Mass Stage to Complex Type: Ultrasonographic Assessment of Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis Across Six Clinical Stages
Yin Yulian, Cheng Yifan, Zhou Liangmei, Zhong Yuanyuan, Wang Bing, Wu Jingjing, Ren Yajuan, Gao Dongwen, Chen Hongfeng, Ye Meina, Yin Haoqiang
Table 2 Distribution of ultrasonographic features in different stages of GLM
Ultrasonographic featuresNon-mass stage
(n = 42)
Mass stage
(n = 61)
Abscess stage
(n = 33)
Late ulceration stage
(n = 27)
Fistula stage
(n = 41)
Complex type#
(n = 57)
χ2P value
# Statistical analysis was not included for the Complex Type as this group may exhibit characteristics from the preceding stages, leading to potential confounding and dilution of effects. * Different types of track signs may occur concurrently within the same case; therefore, the sum of the frequencies of each track sign subtype exceeds the total frequency of the track sign (All Types).
a Fisher’s exact test; b The imaging features marked in this study are strictly stage-dependent (appearing only in specific pathological stages or later stages), and theoretically, they cannot appear prior to the specified stages (with observed values being 0 in this study). Given their 100% specificity (no false positives observed), we conducted the analysis only on subgroups where these features were actually present.
Track Ssign *
(All types)
39
(92.86%)
15
(24.59%)
4
(12.12%)
5
(18.52%)
3
(7.32%)
31
(54.39%)
92.207< 0.001
Track sign with high echogenicity on the inner wall*24
(57.14%)
7
(11.48%)
2
(6.06%)
3
(11.11%)
2
(4.88%)
16
(28.07%)
52.721< 0.001
Track sign with low echogenicity on the inner wall*17
(40.48%)
4
(6.56%)
1
(3.03%)
1
(3.7%)
1
(2.44%)
7
(12.28%)
31.689a< 0.001a
Track sign with isoechogenicity on the inner wall*11
(26.19%)
2
(3.28%)
1
(3.03%)
1
(3.7%)
1
(2.44%)
5
(8.77%)
17.256a< 0.001a
Track sign with periductal abscess formation*7
(16.67%)
2
(3.28%)
1
(3.03%)
1
(3.7%)
1
(2.44%)
3
(5.26%)
7.870a0.057a
Track sign coexisting with ductal inflammation, periductal inflammation, and nodular structures*10
(23.81%)
1
(1.64%)
1
(3.03%)
1
(3.7%)
1
(2.44%)
6
(10.53%)
16.773a<0.001a
Donut sign29
(69.05%)
4
(6.56%)
22
(66.67%)
2
(7.41%)
2
(4.88%)
7
(12.28%)
88.196< 0.001
False burr sign0
(0%)
48
(78.69%)
2
(6.06%)
8
(29.63%)
7
(17.07%)
17
(29.82%)
64.005b< 0.001b
Large areas of mixed echogenicity with irregularly thickened and rough abscess walls; a flowing sensation within the abscess cavity was observed upon probe compression.0
(0%)
0
(0%)
33
(100%)
8
(29.63%)
4
(9.76%)
11
(19.30%)
63.599b<0.001b
A relatively well-defined and smooth-edged hypoechoic area was observed in the areolar region, communicating with the ductal system.0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
19
(70.37%)
19
(46.34%)
23
(40.35%)
3.813b0.043b
A duct-like hypoechoic structure extending toward the skin was observed, with thickening of the inner wall of the duct.0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
3
(7.32%)
38
(92.68%)
26
(45.61%)
21.815b< 0.001b